Woman who refused to be paid off and silenced by billionaire obviously ‘greedy cow’

author avatar by 7 years ago

A woman taking her employer to court for constructive dismissal has been called ‘greedy’ because she refused an out of court settlement.

Eva Carneiro rejected a £1.2m settlement from Chelsea, preferring to have her day in court and to ensure that the facts of the case end up in the public domain.

However, men everywhere have been quick to hail the former Chelsea club doctor as a ‘greedy cow’ who should clearly take the money and ‘shut her dirty whore mouth’.

Football fan Derek Matthews said he backed Chelsea’s billionaire owner Roman Abramovich in the matter, as he ‘probably just offered her a million quid to shut up because he’s one of those benevolent billionaires you read about in the news’.

Matthews went on, “Me? I’ve got absolutely fuck-all morals so I’d have taken the cash without question. I can be bought far more cheaply, for the record.

“There are absolutely no circumstances in which I would prefer to have my day in court and in which money would become a secondary consideration, none whatsoever.

“It’s all about the money. If that’s not the case for you, then you’re an idiot.”

Football analyst Simon Williams said that maybe there is more to the story than we’ve heard so far.told us, “I know Chelsea literally shit money, but you don’t offer to pay someone over a million quid if you’ve not done anything wrong.

He told us, “I know Chelsea literally shit money, but you don’t offer to pay someone over a million quid if you’ve not done anything wrong.

“So maybe – just maybe – Ms Carneiro is more interested in bringing the facts before courts, than she is in taking a bit of hush money from a Russian billionaire?

“Most legal experts say her settlement will be less than £1.2m, even if she wins, so this is difficult to comprehend for a lot of men who have immediately assumed she rejected the settlement because she’s after more money.

“I mean, what if she’s one of these sick weirdos that believes in ‘justice’?”